Data Loggers - Your Source for Temperature Data Loggers, Humidity Data Loggers, Pressure Data Loggers,Relative Humidity Data Loggers,CO data loggers,CO2 data loggers,Rainfall Gauges,Soil Moisture Content Measurement and many other data logging,measurement or recording devices

Application Note: 900 MHz vs 2.4 GHz

To determine whether you should use 900 MHz or 2.4 GHz RFd2d technology for your products you need to answer the following:

  • What is the maximum range your product needs to communicate?
  • Will your product be deployed outside North America, Australia or Israel?

What is the maximum range your product needs to communicate?
The major difference between 900 MHz and 2.4 GHz wireless OEM modules is range. While MaxStream's 9XStream (900 MHz) offers much greater range than the 24XStream (2.4 GHz), the 24XStream is more accepted internationally. The following table lists specific differences between the 9XStream and 24XStream.

Feature 9XStream
(900 MHz)
24XStream
(2.4 GHz)
Pager & cell rejection 70 dB Pagers and cell phones seldom interfere with this band
Transmit power
21 dBm 18 dBm
Receive sensitivity
-110 dBm -104 dBm
Range
(9600-baud module, line-of-sight)
Indoor: 600' to 1500'
Outdoor: 7 miles with dipole antenna, over 20 miles with gain antenna
Indoor: 150' to 375'
Outdoor: 1.4 miles with dipole antenna, over 4.5 miles with gain antenna
Path loss
(for more information, see the section "Comparing Wave Propagation of 2.4 GHz and 900 MHz Frequencies")
Because the 24XStream operates at 2.4 GHz, it has +8.519 dB more path loss than the 9XStream which operates at 900 MHz
Cost
The 24XStream lists up to 34% less than the 9XStream
Unlicensed operation North America, Australia, Israel Worldwide
TX current consumption
(when not in power-down mode)
150 mA 250 mA
RX current consumption
(when not in power-down mode)
50 mA 90 mA

Simply put, if your range requirements are beyond 375 feet indoors, or beyond 1.4 miles outdoors, you should consider the 9XStream over any other 2.4 GHz product. The 9Xstream proves to be a longer range, lower power and lower cost solution than most 2.4 GHz products.

Will your product be deployed outside North America, Australia or Israel?
Another difference between 900 MHz and 2.4 GHz solutions is that the 900 MHz radio frequency band is for unlicensed use only in North America, Australia and Israel. Worldwide (including North America, Australia and Israel), 2.4 GHz is an unlicensed radio frequency band.

If your product will be deployed worldwide, you should consider 24XStream 2.4 GHz wireless products. The 24XStream offers longer range, lower power and advanced networking capabilities not offered by other 2.4 GHz solutions.

Conclusion
9XStream 900 MHz products are best used in long range, low power applications deployed in North America, Australia and Israel. 24XStream 2.4 GHz products are best used in applications deployed worldwide.

Frequency Usage Table By Products

Each of the MaxStream radio modems uses as little of the available RF spectrum as possible so as to minimize susceptibility to interference from other RF systems as well as minimizing the impact of MaxStream transmissions on RF systems already operating in the area.

Here is a table showing the specific frequencies used by the MaxStream radio modems by product family:

Product family First
Frequency
(MHz)
Last
Frequency
(MHz)
Frequency
spacing
(KHz)
X09 (USA, Canada) 910.5 917.7 300
XH9 (Israel, Australia, New Zealand) 920.0 927.2 300
X24 (25 channel) 2450.15 2459.75 400
X24 (75 channel) 2450.15 2479.75 400

More technical information on wave propagation and range calculations

Comparing Wave Propagation of 900 MHz and 2.4 GHz Frequencies
To demonstrate the basic difference in wave propagation of 900 MHz and 2.4 GHz waves, a quick look at path loss is provided. As waves propagate out from the transmitter, some attenuation of the signal takes place due to properties of the medium (air in most cases). Path loss describes this attenuation as a function of the wavelength of the operating frequency and the distance between the transmitter and receiver. The path loss is derived from the Friis transmission equation and is defined as:

Path Loss = 20 log(4*p*r/λ) dB

where r is the distance between the transmitter and receiver, and ? is the wavelength . The table below shows how path loss differs between 900 MHz transmitters (λ=0.33 meters) and the 2.4 GHz transmitters (λ=0.125 meters).

NOTE: Path loss analysis does not account for effects such as differing TX power outputs and RX sensitivities. See the "Range of 9XStream (900 MHz) and 24XStream (2.4GHz) Modules" section for more detailed range information.

Frequency r = 10 Meters r = 100 Meters r = 1000 Meters
900 MHz 51.527 dB 71.527 dB 91.527 dB
2.4 GHz 60.046 dB 80.046 dB 100.046 dB

Thus, the path loss is +8.519dB more over a given range for the 2.4 GHz modules. Since the range doubles with every 6 dB of reduced path loss, the 900 MHz modules have 2.67 times as much range as the 2.4 GHz modules [2^(8.519/6) = 2.67].

Range of 9XStream (900 MHz) and 24XStream (2.4 GHz) Modules
A link budget analysis can mathematically predict the system range based on the power output, receiver sensitivity, antenna gains, path loss, and fading margin. The path loss equation represents path loss (signal attenuation) as a function of distance between the receiver and transmitter and the wavelength of the operating frequency. This equation is derived from the Friis transmission equation and is given by:

Path Loss = 20* log(4*p*r/λ) dB (Eq. 1), where

r = distance between transmitter and receiver
& = wavelength

The Friis transmission equation can be used to represent the path loss as the sum of the other system factors leading to the following equation:

Path Loss = P(t) + G(t) + G(r) - R(s) - F(s) dB (Eq. 2), where

P(t) = transmitted power
G(t) = gain of transmit antenna
G(r) = gain of receive antenna
R(s) = sensitivity of receiver
F(s) = fading margin, (experimentally determined to be 22dBm)

These two equations can be used to compare the maximum range of the 9XStream and 24XStream modules.

  1. Consider the range of the 9XStream module:

    = 0.33 meters (for f=900 MHz)

    (Eq. 1) Path Loss = 113 dB = 20 * log(4*p*r/?)
    (Eq. 2) Path Loss = 21dBm + 2dB + 2dB - (-110dBm) - 22dBm= 113 dB

    By setting these equal to each other, a little computation reveals that r=11848 meters, or a little over 7 miles.

  2. Now consider the 24XStream module:

    = 0.125 meters (for f=2.4 GHz)

    (Eq. 1) Path Loss = 105 dB = 20 * log(4*p*r/?)
    (Eq. 2) Link Budget = 18dBm + 2dB + 2dB - (-105dBm) - 22dBm = 105 dB

    Once again, setting these equations equal leads to r=1768 meters, or just over 1 mile.

From this example, it is shown that operating at 900 MHz exhibits a significantly longer range than is possible at 2.4 GHz.

 

MicroDAQ.com accepts
Visa, MasterCard and American Express
Buy Data Loggers from Microdaq.com with Visa, MasterCard and American Express

All prices are in U.S. Dollars.
No U.S. sales tax